Climate & Growing Conditions:
2022 was a year of extremes, chiefly defined by intense heat and drought, although late rains prevented disaster in Valpolicella. The growing season in northern Italy saw one of the worst droughts in decades, with very low precipitation through winter and spring. By early summer 2022, vines were under stress due to lack of water and very high temperatures. Valpolicella experienced sustained heatwaves; many days saw temperatures well above average, and certain afternoons crossed critical thresholds for vine stress (35 °C+). Siccità (drought) was the buzzword – young vines on shallow soils suffered, and some yield reduction was expected. However, a crucial turn came in mid-to-late August: timely, abundant rains arrived in the region. These “August rains” gave vigor back to the vines, revitalizing them both in terms of fruit ripening and even increasing the final juice yields a bit. Grapes that had stalled in the heat now plumped up and continued maturing. By early September, the vineyards had a new lease on life. The Valpolicella Consorzio reported grape quality to be excellent by harvest time, specifically crediting those August downpours for averting what could have been a very problematic year. Any issues remaining were mostly yield-related: overall volume was down slightly (final numbers suggest around 6–7% below the recent average), but not nearly as drastic as initially feared. Hail in 2022 was minimal and caused no widespread damage. One concern in 2022 beyond weather was labor shortage (unrelated to grape quality), but viticulturally the main story is drought followed by rescue rains. Harvest began mid-September; grapes were very healthy and ripe with high sugars and tannins thanks to the long, hot summer, balanced by the late-season moisture that kept them from raisining on the vine.

Wine Profile:
Though still very young, 2022 Amarones are anticipated to be rich, ripe, and bold, fitting the profile of a hot year’s wines (akin to 2017 or 2015). The grapes experienced extreme concentration from the drought, so we expect intense color, elevated alcohol, and dense extract. Early reports indicate the phytosanitary state of the grapes was excellent – virtually no mold or disease due to the dry conditions. This usually translates to very pure fruit flavors in the wine. One can predict lavish dark fruit character (black plum, dried cherry, fruit leather) and possibly higher-than-normal glycerol giving a sumptuous mouthfeel. Tannins, given the small berry sizes under drought, will likely be plentiful and robust. However, the August rains that “refreshed” the vines also likely preserved some acidity and prevented the wines from going overly raisiny. Thus, 2022 might show a tad more freshness than a relentlessly dry year like 2003. The Consorzio described the final maturation phase as good, with grapes reaching optimal state by mid-September. We can also infer from the weather that alcohol levels will be high (perhaps 16% range common) and that the wines will have a big structure. In style, think of 2022 Amarones as luscious and heady, with head-turning aromas of very ripe black fruits, sweet spices, and maybe chocolatey notes, underpinned by a solid tannic backbone. Without a doubt, 2022 will be counted among the “solar” (sunny, hot) vintages that produce generous, immediate wines.

Aging Potential & Comparison:
Vintners are optimistic that 2022’s Amarones, while forward and generous, will also age well. The reason is that the vines, though stressed, yielded berries of great phenolic ripeness and concentration – attributes that typically impart longevity. Additionally, the late-season rain and subsequent cooler period helped retain acidity, which is crucial for aging. Christian Marchesini, the Consorzio president, noted that thanks to the August rains, 2022 quality is excellent, near the five-year average yields – implying that 2022, despite being a drought year, ended up balanced enough in production and quality to be comparable to more “normal” years. This suggests the wines aren’t outliers of port-like character, but true to Amarone style, just on the richer side. In comparison, 2022 might resemble 2017 in general ripeness and structure, since both had drought with some late rain relief (2017 had September rain, 2022 had August). It could also be likened to 2009 or 2011, other warm vintages that delivered excellent wines. The key difference is the severity of early drought in 2022, which may give it an edge in concentration even over those. Early tasting impressions will guide more, but it’s safe to say 2022 will be rated highly (likely 4 to 5 stars) if the wines fulfill their promise. For aging, expect a good 15-20 years for top bottlings; the combination of high extract and sufficient acidity bodes well. As one Italian news outlet summarized during harvest: “Qualità ottima…”, grapes in excellent shape, with only young vines and non-irrigated sandy soils struggling a bit. This means the flagship wines, often from older vines and well-tended plots, will be stellar. Thus, collectors should view 2022 as a worthy successor to 2015 and 2017 – a vintage producing powerful Amarones that will provide pleasure both in youth and with age.

Climate & Growing Conditions: The 2021 vintage is already being hailed by local vintners as a near-perfect growing season for Amarone, often described as “poca ma buona” (low yield but excellent quality) due to some frost but outstanding ripening conditions. In Valpolicella, a significant event was the April 2021 frost, which affected many Italian wine regions. There were spring freezes around April 7–8 that likely reduced the crop in some vineyards (especially early-budding vines in frost-prone spots). However, the rest of the season more than compensated: June, July, and August 2021 were remarkably moderate. During these crucial summer months, daytime temperatures never exceeded ~33 °C – an important threshold for Corvina, above which photosynthesis slows or stops. In 2021, the vines never hit that stress point, so ripening progressed steadily without heat shutdowns. Moreover, night temperatures dropped significantly, with diurnal shifts over 13 °C and consistently low humidity. These conditions (warm days, cool nights, dry air) are ideal for grape quality: they promote flavor development, color fixation, and maintain acidity. Additionally, the dry atmosphere helped keep fungal diseases at bay, and the slow, even ripening allowed grapes to accumulate phenolics without sunburn or shriveling. Veraison likely occurred on time or slightly later due to the frost’s initial slowdown, but by harvest (which started mid- to late-September), grapes had achieved excellent balance – sugar, acid, and phenolics in harmony. Daniele Accordini, a prominent local enologist, dubbed 2021 “the perfect Amarone year” because the weather allowed full maturation on the vine and then a textbook appassimento (drying) process: with healthy, evenly ripened grapes and cool, dry conditions, the grapes could wither slowly and naturally, developing concentration without spoilage.

Wine Profile:
Although most 2021 Amarones are still in barrels or yet to be released (as of 2025), early indications and barrel samples suggest exceptional wines with superb balance. Accordini notes that the effect of the 2021 season was to allow the vines to mature fruit with equilibrium and then to have the grapes dry gradually and healthily in the lofts. We can expect 2021 Amarones to feature rich, pure fruit aromas (thanks to the lack of extreme heat) – likely a vibrant mix of red and black cherry, blackberry, and subtle floral notes – combined with a fresh acidity preserved by the cool nights. Tannins should be plentiful yet fine-grained, given the slow phenolic ripening. One might see a slightly higher acidity and aromatic intensity than in a hotter year like 2017, giving 2021s a graceful power. The alcohol levels will be typical (~15–16%), but because the grapes ripened without overripeness, the wines are expected to have remarkable harmony. In short, 2021’s hallmark will be balance and elegance married to ample structure – potentially a standout combination reminiscent of vintages like 2016 (but with perhaps even cleaner fruit expression). Local winemakers are extremely optimistic, some calling it “annata perfetta” (perfect vintage) for Amarone. Given the slow, complete drying of grapes, the 2021s could also possess excellent aromatic complexity (notes of cinnamon, anise, or other appassimento-derived spices) tightly interwoven with varietal fruit.

Aging Potential & Comparison:
If all predictions hold, 2021 Amarones will be top-tier candidates for long aging. They have the trifecta of high fruit concentration, firm structure, and bright acidity – ingredients for longevity. One producer’s commentary implied that because of the even ripening and drying, 2021’s Amarones will evolve gradually and gracefully, likely taking on beautiful tertiary notes over 20 years or more. In terms of comparisons, insiders are putting 2021 on par with 2016 and 1988 – years noted for their classical balance and longevity. Italia a Tavola reported that 2021 will be remembered as “l’annata perfetta” for Amarone, due to a combination of weather factorsthat allowed full, balanced ripening and ideal appassimento. Not since perhaps 2015 or 2016 has there been such consensus excitement about a vintage’s potential quality. For enthusiasts, the advice is to secure 2021s upon release, and plan to age them – while they will likely be charming even young (thanks to that balance), they should gain in complexity for many years. Comparatively, think of 2021 as having the flawless conditions of 2015 but with a cooler edge like 2016, a recipe for greatness. In sum, 2021 is shaping up to be a reference-point vintage for Amarone, one that professionals will watch closely as the wines emerge.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2020 proved to be a peculiar and challenging vintage, but one that rewarded attentive viticulture with quality fruit. The season began on a positive note: budburst took place around April 6–7, right in line with historical averages. Early spring was warm and dry, encouraging a vigorous start; a luminous, mild spring atmosphere helped the vines along, with April warmth accelerating the vineyard’s “wake-up”. The initial growth was robust (some growers noted an almost impatient vigor), and it became clear that water management would be crucial as the season progressed. Flowering occurred early, between May 25–29, slightly ahead of typical timing. May itself was seasonable in temperature and, importantly, relatively dry, so flowering proceeded evenly without heat or water stress. However, conditions changed in June: after fruit set, frequent rains and cooler-than-normal temperatures in June imposed a new challenge. This wet, cool period demanded vigilant protection against vine pathogens (mildews), as the humidity was high. Many growers had to work diligently to manage outbreaks of disease in early summer. By August, another turn: veraison started in early August (3rd–7th) under initially hot, dry conditions, but then abundant, intense rains arrived in mid-August. This was a dramatic shift – after a hot July, the latter half of August was wet and cooler. The contrast between the early summer heat and the sudden rain cooled the vineyards and slowed ripening a bit, but also relieved any drought stress. September continued on the cooler side, which helped preserve acidity. Harvest commenced in mid-September, slightly ahead of normal (perhaps due to the early start to the season), but overall maturation was delayed compared to very hot years. In summary, 2020 was marked by alternating extremes: a hot/dry start, an unusually wet/cool mid-season, then some warmth punctuated by heavy rain. It put vintners to the test, requiring careful canopy management and disease control, as well as selective harvesting to ensure only balanced, ripe grapes were picked.

Wine Profile: 
The early evaluations of Amarone 2020 (tasted mostly in early 2025 as the wines debut) indicate a complex, structured vintage with a distinctive personality. Despite the irregular season, the wines show a strong “territorial identity” and equilibrium, suggesting the best traits of Valpolicella’s terroir came through. Stylistically, the 2020s are not as massive as something like 2015, but they possess a robust structure with high alcohol typical of Amarone, counterbalanced by excellent acidity. According to the Consorzio’s analysis, Amarone 2020 has “an excellent acid backbone” and a well-balanced aromatic profile for the blend of grape varieties. Tasting notes from the Anteprima (preview) highlight that the wines are approaching maturity in terms of integration, with rich aromatic endowment (aromas derived both from varietals and appassimento) that is well balanced. These aromas include the classic dried cherry and plum, with hints of cocoa, spice, and perhaps a touch of the herbal complexity from the slightly cooler phases. The structural components – tannins and alcohol – are described as worthy of a “Grande Rosso” (great red), yet they are in equilibrium, with no element overshadowing another. In terms of flavor, one can expect 2020 Amarones to deliver intensity and depth (points of color of great intensity and profundity were noted), with fresh acidity providing lift to the dense fruit. Given the story of the vintage, there may be micro-variations: grapes from higher sites (which saw more rain/cool) might give a bit more freshness, while valley floor fruit (which benefitted from quick start and then the August rain) might show richness. All told, early signs point to 2020 being a “complex yet balanced” Amarone year, producing wines with a strong sense of place, ample structure, and lively aromatics.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Amarone 2020 is expected to have very solid aging potential, though it might not be classified as an ultra-long-term giant like 2016. The combination of high acidity and tannin suggests the wines can age well into the mid/late 2030s. In character, local experts have remarked that 2020 in the glass shows a “strong personality that fully reflects the complexity of the vintage and the hard work of producers”. This implies that 2020 will likely stand out as a unique year rather than directly mirroring another. However, one might draw parallels with vintages that had similarly mixed conditions – perhaps 2013 (wet spring, fine finish) or 2008 (less uniform, elegant outcome) – yet 2020 seems to have delivered even better results than those. It’s worth noting that 2020 coincided with the Consorzio’s 100th anniversary, and the celebratory tastings confirmed that despite the year’s trials, the wines are “complex but identitarian” and show remarkable balance. This bodes well for their ability to age; complexity and balance are key to longevity. Many producers are just releasing their 2020s, but optimism is high that this vintage will be remembered for its distinct character and quality despite the climatic swings. Those investing in 2020 Amarone can expect to enjoy them in the medium term (5–8 years) as they gain tertiary notes, and the best bottles should hold for 15+ years, rewarding patience with layered, profound flavor.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2019 is widely considered a fantastic vintage in Valpolicella, combining a cooler start with a warm finish – essentially a balanced, later-ripening year. The vintage experienced a cool, rainy spring, which delayed vine development somewhat and provided ample water supply. Flowering and fruit set were a bit behind schedule due to the cool, wet spring. As summer arrived, conditions shifted: summer 2019 was warm, but not extreme, and importantly late August saw significant day-night temperature fluctuations (hot days, cool nights) that greatly benefited phenolic development. These temperature swings late in the season are ideal for Amarone grapes, as they allow sugar accumulation while preserving acidity and aroma compounds. There were fewer heat spikes than in 2017, for example. The plentiful spring moisture carried the vines through summer without stress. Harvest took place in mid-September, which was slightly later than 2018 but in line with historical averages. Grapes came in fully ripe, thanks to the stable weather in early September, and had enjoyed a long growing season. In summary, 2019 offered a fairly rainy first half and a fine, warm second half, yielding grapes of excellent quality with no significant volume reduction. Many have called 2019 one of the most “classic” vintage patterns in recent years – not too hot, not too cold, with just enough rain at the right times.

Wine Profile: 
The 2019 Amarones are outstanding – complex, balanced, and concentrated. Analytical data shows high levels of anthocyanins and polyphenols in the 2019 wines, indicating deep color and robust structure. In tasting, these wines impress with their refined aromas and equilibrium. They boast great complexity on the nose – layers of dark cherry, dried plum, violets, sweet spices, and a hint of mint or balsam – and the aromas are polished and precise. On the palate, 2019s have a well-balanced structure: there is plenty of ripe fruit and substantial alcohol (as expected of Amarone), but also a vibrant line of acidity that keeps everything in harmonious proportion. The acidity in 2019 contributes to a remarkable freshness, giving lift to the rich flavors. Tannins are present in force yet finely knit, providing texture without harshness. Overall, the wines convey a sense of perfect balance and completeness – power and elegance hand-in-hand. It’s no surprise that 2019 has been lauded as “undoubtedly, one of the best vintages for Amarone… offering aging potential and perfect balance.” Indeed, many producers rank it alongside the greats of the past. The combination of a cooler start (which gives finesse) and a warm finish (which gives body and ripeness) yielded wines that marry structure with aromatic intensity. Some tasters find parallels in 2019 to vintages like 2012 (for depth) but with even more finesse, or to 2016 (for balance) but with a touch more lush fruit.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Given their impeccable balance, 2019 Amarones are poised for long aging. They have the tannin and acid to easily go 15–20 years, and their harmony suggests they will evolve gracefully. In vintage comparisons, 2019 is a five-star vintage, often mentioned in the same breath as 2012 and 2016 for recent high-water marks. It might actually surpass them in consistency; some insiders feel 2019 could be the best since 2011 or even 1997. The wines are surprisingly approachable in their youth (thanks to the polished tannins and balance), but their real value lies in the cellar. With time, expect 2019s to develop even more nuance – earthy, leathery, nutty tones atop the dense fruit core. As for similar profiles, one could compare 2019 to 2004 or 1990 in terms of being “complete” vintages with no edges out of place. For professional enthusiasts and collectors, 2019 is a must-have vintage, offering the rare mix of early appeal and long-term potential that defines a great year.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2018 was a year of contrast and irregularity in Valpolicella. The spring started unusually cold, but temperatures then rose sharply, peaking unseasonably at the end of April. This led to a somewhat uneven early vine development. Moving into summer, the first part (late spring into early summer) was relatively cool and rainy, which delayed things a bit and kept growers on guard for mildew. However, by mid-to-late summer, the pattern shifted: July and August were warmer and much less rainy, though punctuated by significant thunderstorms in some areas. This sporadic storm activity meant some local hail or heavy downpours occurred, potentially causing variability in ripeness across vineyards. Overall, the season ended up warmer than the previous years’ average for August, indicating a toasty finish to summer. So, 2018 saw a cool, wet start and a hot, stormy finish. Because of this, ripening was not fully uniform – some grapes lagged due to the early cool period, and some were affected by storm disruptions. Harvest timing was around average (not as early as 2017, not as late as 2013). The crop was healthy in many places, but the year didn’t provide the effortless ripening of, say, 2015 or 2016. In sum, 2018 was a mixed bag: parts of the season were challenging and results depended on location and luck (avoiding hail).

Wine Profile: 
The 2018 Amarone wines reflect the vintage’s less consistent nature. They generally have a bit lighter structure compared to the powerhouse years immediately before. Analyses show many 2018s with lower anthocyanin and tannin content, resulting in wines that are slightly less deep in color and a touch less structured. On the positive side, acidity tends to be pronounced – the cooler stretches of the season endowed the wines with fresh, elevated acid, which gives a sense of vibrancy. This acidity contributes to an impression of freshness and good aging potential in the better examples. Flavor-wise, expect Amarones of this vintage to emphasize red fruit notes (red cherry, pomegranate), herbal nuances, and spices, rather than dense black fruit. The palate weight is medium-full; some wines feel elegant and agile, while others may come off as simply less concentrated. It was noted that 2018 wines are not always consistent in quality – some are excellent, especially from top producers who managed yields and selection, but others are just decent, lacking the extra oomph. Overall, 2018 can be described as a “fresh and slightly lighter” vintage, producing Amarones with good fragrance and structure that is adequate, if not as rich as the best years. It’s a vintage where producer choice matters; careful tasting is advised to pick the winners.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Thanks to their higher acidity, 2018 Amarones should age respectably, even if they don’t have the massive structure of preceding vintages. The best wines, while a bit leaner, have the balance to improve over a decade or more. In fact, their freshness could make them attractive at maturity, even if they won’t have the body of a 2015 or 2016. One could liken 2018 to vintages like 2008 or 2013, which also had slightly lighter builds but fine equilibrium. Notably, the vintage received a middling three-star rating in at least one chart, indicating it’s viewed as average/good but not great. Comparatively, 2018 is a step down from the excellent run of 2015-2017, more on par with a year like 2011 or 2007 in overall rating – though the style differs (2018 being cooler and lighter). For consumers, 2018 Amarones might be approachable a bit sooner and won’t necessarily require as long a cellar time as the bigger years. They could offer enjoyable mid-term drinking while waiting for, say, 2016s or 2017s to mature. All told, 2018 produced enjoyable, lively Amarones that may not make history but will please those who favor a touch more elegance and acidity in this typically robust wine.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2017 vintage brought extremes in climate, notably a severe spring frost and a dry growing season, but still managed to produce excellent wines. The winter of 2016–17 was dry and harsh, with rainfall well below normal (only a bit in February). This set up vines for potential stress. Then, in April 2017, frost events hit much of northern Italy; Valpolicella saw limited damage overall, but in cooler hill sites some buds were killed. Production volume was cut – especially in higher elevations – by an estimated 15–20% due to the frost and subsequent poor fruit set in those areas. The rest of the season was generally hot and dry: temperatures were often above average, but interestingly, 2017 did not have the relentless heat of 2003. Instead, after a parched early summer, the region got relief in the second half of August and into September when timely rains fell. These late-season rains, combined with significant temperature swings (warm days, cool nights) in late August, helped the grapes achieve perfect ripeness in the cellar(i.e., by harvest time). So despite the drought conditions through mid-summer, the vines received just enough moisture and a break from heat stress at the critical ripening phase. Harvest in 2017 began on the early side (given the overall warm season), and grapes came in with slightly lower sugars than 2016 but excellent phenolic maturity. Overall, 2017 can be characterized by low yields, ripe grapes, and a concentration of flavor – a challenging year that was salvaged by late rains.

Wine Profile: 
The 2017 Amarones are powerful, intense wines, very much reflective of a low-yield, warm vintage. They have deep, saturated colors and substantial extract, indicating a lot of dry matter per volume (concentration). Tannins in 2017 are robust and mature, giving the wines a burly structure, yet the tannins tend to be ripe enough to avoid bitterness. Acidity is reported as “normal” – not as bright as 2016, but sufficient to keep the wines from feeling flabby. Interestingly, alcohol levels in 2017 ended up a bit lower than in 2016, likely due to slightly less sugar accumulation, but make no mistake: these are still high-alcohol wines (often 15–15.5%). On the nose, 2017s deliver intense, penetrating fruity aromas – lots of black cherry, baked plum, and dried blackberry – often alongside notes of raisin, sweet spice, and an earthy undertone. Some wines exhibit a touch of heat on the nose/palate, a reminder of the warm year. The overall character is bold and assertive; some tasters note the alcoholic component is occasionally evident, but generally in balance with the fruit and tannin. In essence, 2017 produced “deep wines with substantial extract… and robust, mature tannins,” as well as penetrating fruit. Quality-wise, despite the weather hurdles, most agree 2017 is an excellent vintage, crafting Amarones of great character. It rightly ranks “among the best vintages” of recent years for its combination of concentration and drinkability.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Thanks to their density and tannic structure, 2017 Amarones have excellent aging prospects. They might not have quite the acidity of 2016 or 2013, but the sheer fruit concentration and tannin will carry them easily 15+ years. Many producers view 2017 as a collector’s vintage, one that will benefit from some cellaring to soften the powerhouse elements. In comparisons, 2017 is often contrasted with 2016: it’s hotter and more forward, whereas 2016 was cooler and more poised. But stylistically, 2017 might resemble a blend of 2015 and 2007 – it has some of 2015’s ripeness and charm, with a bit of 2007’s structure and slightly lower acid. Another similar year is 2012 (also rich and low-yield), though 2017 had the advantage of that late rain to boost balance. Overall, early consensus put 2017 at a strong four-star level, just a tick below the legendary years. As these wines age, expect their exuberant fruit to mellow into dried fig and spice nuances, while the firm tannins resolve. For now, decanting is wise if drinking young. The excellent “evolutionary potential” noted by critics suggests that by the late 2020s, 2017 Amarones will be shining, offering a great mix of power and complexity.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2016 was a vintage of challenges that turned into triumph for diligent producers. The year began with a cold but dry winter, which delayed any early bud activity. Spring, however, was rainy and cool through April and May, leading to persistent humidity issues. This weather caused some of the most critical downy mildew pressure in years – constant vigilance was needed to protect the vines. Additionally, temperatures stayed below average well into the growing season, consistently delaying vine phenological phases (budbreak, flowering, veraison) by several weeks. Fortunately, summer 2016 was not excessively hot; it was warm but not overly so, avoiding additional stress on the already delayed vines. As autumn arrived, conditions improved markedly: September and early autumn were pleasantly warm with good ventilation. These late favorable conditions were crucial for achieving full technical and phenolic maturation – essentially, the vines caught up during the autumn, and grapes were able to ripen fully, albeit later than normal. The constant humidity earlier meant yields were lower (some fruit lost or dropped), but those who managed vineyards effectively were rewarded. In summary, 2016 was considered a “difficult vintage” during the season, yet it yielded excellent results for those who responded well to the challenges. By harvest, which came later in the fall, grapes from well-tended vineyards were in superb condition, making 2016 a triumph snatched from adversity.

Wine Profile: 
The 2016 Amarones turned out to be outstanding wines of great character, often cited as among the best of recent times. They are typically deeply colored and highly extracted, indicating the concentration achieved in the well-managed vineyards. The wines have vibrant, intense color and substantial extract, with robust tannins that are ripe and of high quality. On the palate, one notices significant alcohol (it was a warm autumn), yet these wines also have a spine of bright acidity that provides nerve and balance. In fact, one hallmark of 2016 is the excellent acid structure – likely a result of the cooler early season – which gives the lush fruit an incisive, fresh edge. Aromatically, 2016s are complex and elegant: expect layered notes of black cherry, dried red currant, licorice, pepper, and mineral tones. They show penetrating fruity aromas and often a floral lift, with depth coming from spice and earth nuances. Tannins are plentiful but refined, contributing to a firm yet polished structure. Many producers and critics have lauded 2016 as a “difficult but extraordinary” year, noting that those wines **“stand out for great character and excellent evolutionary potential”. Indeed, even with initial obstacles, 2016 wines earned a full five-star consensus and are regarded as modern classics.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
2016 is a top-tier aging vintage. Thanks to its combination of high extract, sound acidity, and impeccable balance, the wines are expected to have long lives, 20+ years easily for the best. Early tastings already put 2016 in elite company: one retailer’s analysis calls 2016 “very promising… grapes particularly colorful and aromatically powerful, with great acidity… complex wines offering medium to long cellaring capacity.”. Comparatively, 2016 is often mentioned in the same breath as 2006 and 2012 (all superb vintages) for its quality. But stylistically, 2016 perhaps most resembles 2010, with its cooler-year freshness merged with excellent ripeness – a combo that yields both finesse and structure. Some have gone as far as calling 2016 one of the all-time greats in Amarone history, akin to revered years like 1988 or 1990 for its classical harmony. In short, collectors should treasure 2016 bottles; patience will be greatly rewarded as these wines unfurl layers of complexity over decades. For immediate context, many 2016s are approachable now due to fine tannins, but the best strategy is to hold them – this vintage is destined for legend status in Valpolicella.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2015 is heralded as a truly exceptional vintage for Amarone – a year of ideal weather and superb fruit. It started with an abundant winter snowfall, which was crucial in saturating soils with water. This generous water reserve enabled a regular and early vegetative cycle once spring arrived. From mid-June onward, rainfall was scarce and temperatures climbed well above average. Essentially, the summer of 2015 was hot, sunny, and very dry, creating near-perfect ripening conditions for the grapes. The sustained heat accelerated ripening; veraison and sugar accumulation were ahead of schedule. In fact, grape maturity was reached roughly ten days earlier than usualin many vineyards. Importantly, despite the heat, vine stress was mitigated by the winter’s water reserves, so grapes did not desiccate prematurely. The dry weather meant virtually no disease pressure, and growers report the grape health was among the best in recent memory – little to no intervention was needed to combat rot or mildew. Harvest occurred under fine conditions, relatively early, with ripe, pristine clusters coming in. By all accounts, 2015 offered a textbook growing season: ample water early, then a long, warm, dry summer, and a trouble-free harvest.

Wine Profile: 
As expected, 2015 Amarones are outstanding, combining power, ripeness, and balance. The wines are deeply colored and intensely flavored, brimming with concentrated fruit. They show vibrant, dark hues in the glass – a sign of high anthocyanin levels from the sunny summer. On the palate, they are full-bodied and lavish, with substantial extract and robust tannins that reached optimal maturity. Despite high tannin and alcohol, these components are well-integrated; tasters note the wines carry significant alcoholic strength yet remain remarkably balanced and drinkable even young. Aromatically, 2015s burst with sharp, penetrating fruity aromas – lots of black cherry, blackberry preserve, dried plum, and accompanying notes of spice, cacao, and sometimes floral hints. The overall impression is one of great character and harmony. Many producers have called 2015 one of the best vintages of recent decades, as the wines display both immediate appeal and the structure for longevity. In short, these are bold, rich Amarones with excellent equilibrium – the kind of vintage that showcases what Amarone can be at its finest.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Thanks to their stellar balance, 2015 Amarones have excellent aging potential (15–20+ years). Early tastings showed them to be approachable, but they have the stuffing to develop complexity over a long time. An analysis from one source noted 2015 was “exceptional in every way” and that the wines have “great capacity for aging (10 to 20+ years)”. Indeed, some experts directly compare 2015 to 2000 and 1995 – all being exceptional vintages known for longevity. Like those years, 2015 benefited from an ideal balance of elements, suggesting it will be remembered as a benchmark. In character, 2015 shares similarities with 2007 and 2011 (ripe, generous vintages) but likely surpasses them in overall quality and aging curve. It also foreshadows 2017 and 2022, other hot, dry years, though 2015 had the advantage of perfect timing of rain vs. heat. Collectors can confidently cellar 2015s alongside the likes of 2006 and 2016. For professionals, the vintage is useful for showcasing Amarone’s potential: even in youth these wines impressed (some 2015s earned 100-point scores from critics), and with time they are expected to join the pantheon of legendary Amarone vintages.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2014 was an infamously difficult vintage in Valpolicella – by many accounts, one of the worst in decades. The growing season was characterized by cool temperatures and excessive rainfall virtually from start to finish. Summer 2014 was unusually cold, with daytime highs below average and an utter lack of the typical heat spikes. In addition, sunlight hours were reduced (many overcast days), hindering ripening. The region experienced abnormal precipitation levels – an atypically wet summer with frequent rainstorms and high humidity. This created constant challenges for vine health: disease pressure (mildews, mold) was extremely high, and vineyard managers had to be vigilant with canopy management and treatments. Despite efforts, achieving full ripeness was next to impossible in some sites. Harvest came late and was a race against rot; many grapes never reached ideal sugar or phenolic ripeness. Notably, some producers made the drastic decision not to bottle Amarone at all from 2014 – either declassifying the wine or skipping production – due to the subpar fruit quality. Those who did proceed had to conduct severe sorting of grapes and often reduced volumes. In summary, cool, wet, sun-starved conditions made 2014 a critically bad year for Amarone, with only rare pockets of decent fruit. (The Consorzio’s own reports later confirmed 2014 as an extremely problematic vintage, and top producers like Bertani publicly announced they would not release their Amarone due to the climate’s effects.)

Wine Profile: 
Given the weather, 2014 Amarones are generally dilute, lighter-bodied, and lack the balance expected of the style. Even after careful selection, the wines tend to show less concentration of color and extract, and their structures are often soft or uneven. Tannins, if not fully ripe, can come across as edgy or green, yet paradoxically the wines feel slim. Many 2014s have visible roughness and herbal tones, betraying the under-ripe nature of the grapes. Acidity is sometimes elevated (from lack of ripeness), but without corresponding fruit weight, it can stick out. On the positive side, the wines do possess freshness and may have pretty aromatic nuances (red berries, pepper, earth) in the best cases. However, by Amarone standards, they are underpowered and unbalanced, and not suitable for long aging or significant praise. A contemporaneous review bluntly noted 2014 wines were “not always well-balanced, exhibiting some roughness and less suitable for aging.” Many have a short finish and lack the warm depth Amarone lovers expect. It is clear that 2014 is not among the best vintages of Amarone della Valpolicella – in fact, it’s often cited as a modern low point.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Most 2014 Amarones (for those that were made) are best consumed early. They do not have the concentration or structure for long-term aging, and indeed a number of them have probably already faded given the vintage’s thin profile. Unlike great years that can improve a decade or more, 2014’s advice was essentially to drink up within the first 5–8 years. This vintage draws unfavorable comparisons to other washout years: insiders liken 2014 to 2002 – both had cool, rainy seasons where much of the crop was lost or subpar. The difference is that 2002 at least had some late warmth in places, whereas 2014 was consistently poor through summer. It’s telling that several top Amarone producers skipped their single-vineyard or reserve bottlings in 2014 (and some skipped Amarone entirely), a scenario not seen since perhaps 1984. For perspective, while 2014 was a disaster for Valpolicella’s red wines, neighboring regions (like much of Italy) also struggled, marking 2014 as a generally bad vintage. In short, serious collectors avoid 2014 Amarone; any bottles in the cellar should be opened sooner than later, as they won’t reward further waiting.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2013 was a year of two halves: a very wet, delayed start, followed by a warm, benign finish. Winter 2012–13 brought heavy snow in the surrounding mountains and cold temperatures in Valpolicella. Then spring 2013 was exceptionally rainy – the region experienced relentless rains for about two months, including a damaging flood event in May. These conditions significantly set back the vine cycle; flowering and fruit set were delayed and tricky. After late May, however, the weather pattern normalized. From June onward, temperatures returned to normal and rainfall abated, allowing the vines to catch up slowly. The rest of summer was reasonably warm and stable (though slightly behind schedule due to the earlier delay). By early autumn, grapes had reached full ripeness, albeit a bit later than usual – harvest was postponed compared to recent years, occurring under mostly dry conditions in later September and even October. The key with 2013 was that the initial two-month lag was never fully erased; thus phenolic ripeness came with a slight delay, but it did arrive thanks to a favorable late season. Growers who managed the spring challenges (disease pressure, vineyard work in muddy conditions) ended up with beautifully balanced grapes. In summary, 2013 started with adversity but ended as a “great vintage with only slight delays”, yielding a crop of high quality, if not entirely uniform across all sites.

Wine Profile: 
The 2013 Amarones are regarded as excellent wines balancing structure and finesse. Because of the cooler, wetter spring, these wines often have a crisp acidity and aromatic lift – traits of a cooler vintage – combined with the solid ripeness from the warm summer that followed. They tend to exhibit bright, focused fruit (red cherry, redcurrant, dried cranberry) along with floral and spice nuances. Tannins are present and firm, but not overbearing; there’s a certain fineness to the 2013 tannic structure, giving the wines an elegant frame. Many tasters highlight the remarkable balance of the 2013s: they have plenty of structure and concentration, yet also a freshness and moderate alcohol that make them very poised. Indeed, 2013 is counted “among the best vintages” for how it marries structure with finesse, and the wines show good acidity providing freshness. One caveat noted is that results were “not always uniform” – likely a nod to the fact that some vineyards waterlogged in spring couldn’t fully catch up, so a few wines may lack the depth of others. But top producers made stellar Amarones with complexity (layers of tobacco, mineral, black tea notes appear) and excellent balance. Overall, 2013 wines come off as classically-styled, with a bit less heft than 2012 or 2015, but perhaps more refinement and aromatic complexity.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
With their harmony and fine structure, 2013 Amarones have very interesting aging potential. They aren’t as massive as some preceding vintages, but the best have the acid/tannin backbone to age 15-20 years. At 10+ years old now, they are entering a lovely phase, showing both youthful fruit and some emerging tertiary notes. Many believe 2013 will age similarly to 2008 or 2010 – vintages that also emphasized elegance and have aged gracefully. It’s worth noting that some commentators place 2013 slightly below the absolute top years (like 2016 or 2019) in stature, but still regard it as a great vintage in context. In tasting, one might compare 2013’s style to 2018 in the sense of fine-boned structure, though 2013 had better overall ripeness. Another analogy is to 2004 (a cooler year that ended up superb) – both delivered balanced wines of high quality. For those holding 2013s, feel confident to continue cellaring the top bottles; for current drinking, a brief decant helps them open up. In all, 2013 confirmed that even a challenging start can yield a fantastic Amarone year when late-season conditions cooperate.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2012 vintage was defined by a cold start and a hot finish, resulting in one of the earliest harvests on record. Winter 2011–12 was cold and quite dry, with deep frost events. Come early spring, temperatures spiked in March, causing vines to wake early; budbreak was ahead of schedule and flowering began by mid-May, significantly early. However, as summer approached, rain returned at the beginning of summer (June) – persistent rains in early summer helped curb the vine’s vigor and actually kept yields low (fewer and smaller clusters), concentrating the eventual crop. After that brief wet spell, the weather shifted dramatically: summer 2012 was very hot and dry. July and August saw prolonged heat with scarce rainfall, inducing rapid ripening of the already small crop. The heat was such that harvest began in late August, a rare occurrence, and continued through a warm, dry September. Despite the challenges of heat, grape health was excellent; vines had enough water early on and then simply accelerated through veraison and maturation. By the end of September, an outstanding grape yield (quality-wise) was obtained, albeit in limited quantity. Overall, 2012 is remembered as an outstanding vintage in terms of fruit quality, if a bit extreme in timing.

Wine Profile: 
The Amarones of 2012 are sumptuous, powerful wines, clearly among the most opulent of the era. Due to the hot, dry summer and reduced yields, these wines have remarkable richness: high alcohol levels (often 16%+), dense extract, and lush textures. They flaunt ripe, voluptuous flavors – think dried black cherry, plum sauce, fig, and chocolate – with an almost Port-like intensity in some cases. Tannins are abundant but generally ripe, buried under waves of fruit. Acidity is moderate; 2012 is more about smoothness and weight than freshness. The balance tilts toward the alcoholic and glycerol side, yet in the best examples there’s enough structure to carry it off. Professional assessments place 2012 “undoubtedly among the best vintages”, producing “opulent wines with significant alcoholic components” and great extract. These wines also have “interesting aging potential” due to their concentration. The consistency across producers was relatively high – many wineries declared 2012 a great success. If there’s a caveat, it’s that some wines may feel a touch warm or monolithic given how ripe the fruit became. Stylistically, 2012 is a big, bold year, akin to a 2003 or 2015 but with better overall results than 2003 and perhaps more sheer heft than 2015.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
With their massive fruit and tannin, 2012 Amarones were built to age. At 11–12 years old, they remain youthful in many cases; the top wines can easily age into the late 2020s and beyond. The high alcohol and extract should preserve them, as long as the bottles are well stored. In vintage charts, 2012 earned a coveted five-star rating and is frequently mentioned in the same breath as 2006 and 2016 as recent high points. Like those vintages, 2012s can evolve for 20 years. In character, one might compare 2012 to 2015 – both were hot, dry summers yielding exceptional wines. Indeed, some have noted 2012 as a prototype of the modern warm-vintage Amarone: powerful, heady, and impressive. Collectors should note that while these wines are impressive now (with decanting), patience will reward greater complexity down the line. Expect dried fruit and spice tones to deepen as the big primary fruit mellows. Overall, 2012 stands as one of the benchmark “ripe” vintages of Amarone, combining brawn with surprising age-worthiness.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2011 growing season was marked by warmth and irregular rain, ultimately producing an early-ripening year. Winter 2010–11 saw abundant rainfall with average temperatures, which led to an early budbreak in the vineyards. Spring continued warmer than normal and notably very dry, pushing vines further ahead of schedule. In a twist, June and July then saw high rainfall, which was actually beneficial – it replenished water reserves and sustained the advancing vine cycle. By August, the weather flipped again to hot and rainless. Essentially, 2011 had a surging start (warm/dry), a wet early summer, then a hot finish, but throughout, the vegetative pace remained ahead of normal. Thanks to the early head-start and the August heat, grapes remained on an accelerated ripening timeline, and they achieved full ripeness with excellent health by harvest. The upshot was a slightly early harvest window, with picking in many places occurring well before the usual late-September date. Growers reported grape quality was excellent, and crucially the vines’ early lead was “maintained,” meaning the rain in summer did not cause significant delays or mildew issues. 2011 ended up as a ripe year with ample water at the right times and no significant vine stress – a recipe for potentially great fruit.

Wine Profile: 
2011 is counted among the strong vintages for Amarone, often praised for finesse and balance in the wines. The alternating weather delivered wines that are ripe and generous (thanks to the heat) yet also refined (perhaps due to the mid-season rain preventing overconcentration). In the glass, 2011 Amarones typically showcase luxuriant dark fruit flavors – black cherry, kirsch, dried berries – with polished tannins and a full, round body. They have plenty of extract and alcohol, but many maintain good equilibrium, not feeling overdone. Critics note that not all wines were uniform – some variability exists, as a few producers may have struggled with the hot spikes or picking decisions. However, at their best, 2011s hit a lovely midpoint between power and elegance. Aromas often include dried roses, sweet spices, and a touch of balsamic, indicating complexity. Structure-wise, they carry ample tannin (sufficient for aging) but the tannins tend to be softer than the firmer 2010s, for example. Overall, 2011 is considered one of the better modern vintages – perhaps a half-step below the absolute greats only because of some inconsistency, but with high peaks of quality that are very compelling.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Now at 12–13 years of age, 2011 Amarones are showing very well, with top wines entering a prime drinking window. Their balance and structure suggest they can continue to hold medium-to-long term (5+ more years for the best), but many are enjoyable now. In terms of comparisons, 2011 is often mentioned alongside 2007, 2009, and 2004 as “excellent vintages that can be drunk now” – implying that these years produced stellar wines that have reached a satisfying maturity. Indeed, an Amarone expert panel grouped 2011 in with those vintages as equally high in quality. Style-wise, 2011 shares the generosity of 2007 but perhaps with a touch more polish. It isn’t as cool or floral as 2010, nor as opulent as 2012, but strikes a nice equilibrium. All told, 2011 sits comfortably in the top tier of recent decades and rewards both drinkers (for its current harmony) and collectors (for its continued capacity to age a while longer).

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2010 stands out as a cool, late, and challenging vintage in Valpolicella – in fact, many experts consider it critical but ultimately rewarding. The year was marked by an unstable, very cold, and rainy pattern through much of the growing season. Spring and early summer were unusually cool and wet, delaying vine phenology significantly. There were also stark differences across microclimates: warmer, well-ventilated hillside sites fared better, while low-lying vineyards struggled with water and lack of heat. A burst of heat arrived in August (with some peak high temperatures), which helped push the ripening forward, but overall the harvest was later than usual. Grape ripening did reach completion, but with lower sugar levels than in hot years, thus potential alcohol was a bit reduced. Conversely, acidity remained pronounced, even marked in certain wines, given the cool season. Winemakers noted significant variation in ripeness between different valleys and elevations – 2010 really tested vineyard management, with careful canopy and disease management being crucial. Thankfully, a stable, warm autumn allowed the slower vines to finally ripen phenolically, and by harvest (which was later than 2009) grapes were healthy if less opulent. Many producers likened the conditions to more traditional vintages of decades past due to the coolness.

Wine Profile: 
Despite the difficulties, the 2010 Amarones turned out to be excellent in an aromatic, structured, “classic” style**. These wines often surprise with their elegance and freshness, showcasing high-toned aromas and bright flavors not always seen in warmer years. They tend to have a fragrant bouquet – dried red cherries, red plum, herbs, and floral notes – with an almost Bordeaux-like clarity to the fruit thanks to the cooler ripening. On the palate, 2010s are medium to full-bodied but not heavy; they present overall harmony and finesse, with acidity providing lift and framing the fruit. Tannins are usually fine-grained and persistent, giving a somewhat austere structure in youth that has softened beautifully over time. An Amarone from 2010 will typically show vibrant fruity sensations, savory depth, and a certain austerity that speaks to the cool vintage. Importantly, alcohol levels are a bit lower than surrounding years (due to lower sugars), so these wines feel more balanced and less fiery. Many observers praise 2010 as a throwback to Amarone’s old-school balance – indeed, one international vintage report declared 2010 the finest Amarone year of the decade for its exceptional harmony. In contrast to the big, ripe 2009 vintage before it, 2010’s profile is all about refinement and structure over sheer power.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
The aging potential of 2010 is superb. Thanks to their high acidity, solid tannic core, and moderate alcohol, these wines have a slow evolution. Over a decade on, they are just hitting a great stride: many can age another 10+ years easily. As noted, 2010 is viewed by experts as arguably the best Amarone vintage of the 2010s – it’s often compared to classic cooler-year successes like 1996 or even 1988 (for those with long memories). Within the 2000–present era, it is contrasted with 2009 (warm, fleshy) and lauded alongside later vintages like 2016 or 2019, which also valued finesse. One report in 2022 noted that top 2010s have exceptional harmony and will drink well for at least another 10–15 years. In summary, 2010 produced beautifully balanced, age-worthy Amarones – wines that prove that slightly cooler conditions can yield some of Valpolicella’s most classically proportioned and long-lived bottles.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2009 season in Valpolicella had some swings but ultimately delivered excellent quality grapes. Winter rainfall was around normal, but then spring was quite wet, with abundant rains that slightly slowed vegetative growth early on. By summer, the pattern shifted to the typical dry, hot weather the region expects – July and August had modest precipitation and plenty of sunshine. Grapes enjoyed a regular, uninterrupted ripening through summer. The harvest occurred on schedule under largely dry conditions, and clusters were healthy and fully mature at picking. There were some oddities: early parts of the year were on the cool side, whereas the harvest period itself was extremely hot (a heat spike during picking). Overall, quantity was down about 10% from the prior year 2008, but quality was excellent according to reports. In short, 2009 had a “peculiar” climatic progression – a cooler start and a very hot finish – but vineyards came through with ripe fruit, albeit a slightly smaller crop.

Wine Profile: 
The 2009 Amarones are generally bold, ripe, and fruit-driven, in line with the warm finish to the season. Many wines show plush dark fruit flavors – black cherry, currants, dried plum – with ample sweetness from high ripeness. Tannins are firm and present, but tend to be well-ripened and coated by the fruit extract. Acidity is lower than in cooler years, so the wines tilt toward a rich, rounded profile. In some cases, the irregular climate led to slight variations: a few wines may show a touch of overripeness or warmth. Indeed, observers noted 2009 as a vintage of “sporadic results” – not every producer excelled equally. It isn’t unanimously among “the best of Amarone,” yet many wines are of very high quality, with some truly outstanding bottlings. Style-wise, think of 2009 as delivering the sumptuousness of a hot year (akin to 2011 or 2015) but perhaps without the perfect balance of the absolute top vintages. Still, top 2009 Amarones received critical acclaim and show remarkable depth and intensity.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
With their abundant fruit and tannin, 2009s have aged well over the past 14–15 years. The best have enough structure to continue evolving, although most are entering their prime drinking window now. This vintage was rated four out of five stars, reflecting strong quality if not utter perfection. In comparison to adjacent years, 2009 sits between the finesse of 2008 and the stern structure of 2010. Notably, 2010 was a cool year that produced very fresh, aromatic wines – a contrast often cited when discussing 2009’s warm profile. Those contrasts highlight 2009’s character: it’s more about ripe fruit, tannic strength, and sensual texture, akin to 2011 in many ways. Collectors can confidently drink 2009s now, but top examples (from say Allegrini, Dal Forno, etc.) will also reward a few more years of cellaring. All in all, 2009 is a high-quality Amarone vintage with a classic warm-year profile, sitting just a notch below the legendary years in reputation.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2008’s growing season can be characterized as moderate overall, with significant rain early. Spring 2008 brought abundant rainfall, which replenished soils but also meant growers had to manage vigor and mildew early on. By summer, conditions evened out: temperatures in June–August were around the seasonal norm (not excessively hot), providing a steady ripening period. The weather pattern varied across the Valpolicella zones, interacting with each area’s soils. Notably, the climate’s interplay with terroir led to different expressions: in the western “Classico” valleys (Sant’Ambrogio, San Pietro in Cariano, Fumane), the wines showed more austerity; in the Negrar valley, more opulence; farther east (Cazzano, Mezzane, Illasi), the wines demonstrated richness; Marano’s high hills gave finesse; and the Valpantena valley yielded elegant profiles. This indicates that 2008 did not impose one dominant trait but allowed site character to shine, given the absence of extreme heat or drought. Harvest proceeded under mostly stable conditions, though overall extract levels in grapes were a bit lower than very warm years.

Wine Profile: 
The hallmark of 2008 Amarones is elegance and approachability rather than sheer power. Because the extract and tannin levels were a touch lower, the wines have a softer, smoother texture on average. They tend to emphasize fresh red fruit tones, floral notes (rose, violet), and silky spice, with a medium-bodied structure. Many 2008s possess bright acidity, giving them an appealing freshness and lift. While there are peaks of excellence from top producers, as a whole the vintage does not consistently hit the concentration or heft of the greatest years. A criticism is that some 2008 wines lack the stuffing for very extended aging; they are harmonious early in life but don’t have the muscle of, say, 2006 or 2009. Still, quality is solid and pleasurable, just not among the all-time best for longevity. In essence, 2008 yielded refined, balanced Amarones with an emphasis on finesse over brute force.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Given their slightly lighter structure, 2008 Amarones were suited to mid-term aging. Now 15+ years on, the best examples are drinking at their peak, offering fully melded tannins and tertiary complexity (leather, dried herbs) alongside remaining fruit. However, this vintage is not renowned for long-term staying power; most wines are best consumed by around 15–18 years of age. In vintage comparisons, 2008 might be likened to 2013 or 2018 – all are vintages where freshness and elegance were notable, but results could be variable and not uniformly powerful. Interestingly, despite its more delicate nature, one vintage chart ranked 2008 quite high (5/5 stars) – likely reflecting that the top wines can be excellent, even if the year wasn’t consistently top-tier. For serious enthusiasts, 2008 is a vintage to enjoy for its charm and nuance rather than one to hold for decades.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2007 vintage featured a distinctly warm and dry growing season, yet conditions were favorable rather than extreme. Throughout the year, average temperatures were consistently higher than historical norms, and precipitation was generally below normal. This led to early budbreak and a regular, on-schedule flowering, as the vines progressed quickly thanks to the warmth. The summer was hot but importantly not overly wet, which minimized disease pressure. Crucially, the harvest period in 2007 enjoyed splendid sunny days coupled with cool nights. That day-night temperature alternation in September was ideal for Amarone: it preserved acidity and aroma precursors (especially enhancing Corvina’s aromatic development) while still allowing full ripening. Grapes were picked under excellent conditions, with perfect phenolic ripeness and no weather interruptions.

Wine Profile: 
2007 is regarded as one of the top modern vintages for Amarone, yielding wines of impressive depth and volume. Given the warm season, the wines are rich and concentrated, with ripe tannins and high glycerol giving a plush mouthfeel. They show plenty of dark, penetrating fruit character – think black cherry jam, dried blackberry, and raisins – alongside notes of chocolate, tobacco, and sweet spices. Despite the warmth, the best 2007s retain good acidity and balance, likely helped by those cool harvest nights. Tannins achieved good maturity (no green streaks here), and there’s a solid acidic backbone that prevents the wines from seeming heavy. In fact, critics praised 2007 for having power with finesse: big structure and olfactory intensity (aromas leaping from the glass) combined with a sense of harmony. It was a “warm vintage with tannins of good maturity… and penetrating fruity notes”. Overall, 2007 wines are generous, bold yet smooth, and many estates consider it a highlight of the 2000s.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
With its formidable fruit and tannin, 2007 Amarone was built for long-term aging. Indeed, these wines showed well young and have continued to evolve; at 15+ years they are entering a great drinking window, and top bottles will hold for at least another 5-10 years. The aging potential is rated very high, similar to other heat-endowed vintages like 2011 or 2015, which also produced cellar-worthy wines. Some compare 2007 to 2011 in style – both warm years that nonetheless retained balance and yielded elegant power. In vintage charts, 2007 earned a solid four-star rating, just shy of the absolute top. It stands as a benchmark for a ripe-yet-balanced Amarone year, often mentioned in the same breath as 2009 or 2011 for its drinkability and structure.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
2006 was a superb growing season in Valpolicella, often cited as one of the modern great years. Spring featured normal rainfall, supporting good early vine development. Summer began hot and dry – notably, July saw no rain at all, concentrating the grapes. In early August the weather shifted to a pattern of frequent but low-intensity rains, especially in the first two-thirds of the month. These light rains were ideal: they prevented drought stress and kept the vines photosynthesizing, yet were gentle enough not to cause disease. As a result, grape clusters grew and ripened under near-perfect conditions, achieving excellent physiological maturity by early fall. Harvest time was blessed with fine weather as well: growers could pick at the optimal moment of ripeness, with grapes in excellent health. The autumn of 2006 into early winter was consistently cool and dry, with very few foggy or humid days, allowing a gradual and thorough appassimento (drying) of the grapes without rot.

Wine Profile: 
The 2006 Amarones are exceptional, combining power and elegance. Thanks to the ideal ripening, grapes accumulated high concentrations of polyphenols (deep color, ample tannins) and plenty of sugar/alcohol – yet acid levels remained healthy to support all that richness. These wines are typically full-bodied and intensely flavored, with a core of black cherry and plum fruit wrapped in notes of cocoa, dried herbs, and sweet spice. The tannins are robust but ripe, providing structure and longevity. Despite the important alcohol (often 16% or more), the wines don’t come off as hot or unbalanced; there is sufficient “nervy” acidity to keep them vibrant. Aromatically, many 2006s show complex and refined bouquets – a sign of both the quality of fruit and careful élevage. In summary, 2006 produced some of the most impressive Amarone of the 2000s, deservedly earning a five-star rating in vintage charts.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Long-term aging potential is outstanding for 2006. Now at around 17–18 years, the best examples are still evolving beautifully and can go another decade or more. This year sits in the pantheon of Amarone vintages alongside years like 2016, 2012, 1998, or 1990, which are all powerful and age-worthy. A well-made 2006 Amarone has the structure to age 20+ years with ease. Professionals often note that 2006 combines the concentration of a warm year with the balance of a cooler year, a balance also seen in 2016. For enthusiasts, 2006 bottles can be held with confidence; this vintage will reward patience and is frequently cited as one of the best of the early 2000s.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2005 season was closer to average, with no extreme events, but it included a few quirks. Winter and early spring weather aligned with historical norms for Valpolicella. From flowering through ripening, conditions were generally favorable: days were warm (but not scorching) and sunlight was typical for summer, punctuated by the usual pattern of mild storms in the growing season. However, in early September very intense rains hit the region. Fortunately, these downpours were followed by sunny, windy days, so the late-season rot pressure was minimized and grapes could dry out before harvest. By October and November, temperatures dropped below average with low humidity, enabling an excellent withering (appassimento) phase for harvested grapes in the drying lofts.

Wine Profile: 
Amarone wines of 2005 are generally good but unremarkable. Owing to the mid-September rain, some dilution and variability crept in. Quality is uneven – while some producers made very nice wines, others show slight dilution or herbal streaks. Tasting notes often mention red fruits, spices, and a lighter body compared to big vintages. Acidity is adequate and alcohol levels are moderate, but a few wines show a bit of roughness or rustic tannin on the finish. In sum, 2005 yielded “interesting wines with varying results”. It is not considered among the top-tier vintagesof Amarone, but at the same time it avoided any major faults; one could call it a “normal” year.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Now around 18–19 years on, most 2005s are fully mature and should be enjoyed. The vintage’s moderate structure means it was never destined for very long aging. Compared to more structured years (2004 or 2006), the 2005s peaked earlier and many are in decline. Stylistically, 2005 can be likened to 2001 or 2013 in that it produced balanced, mid-weight Amarones that drink well in their first 10–15 years. Collectors generally do not seek out 2005 as a long-term hold; it’s best categorized as a drink-now or short-term cellaring vintage. Any well-stored bottles should be consumed in the near term, as they won’t improve further.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2004 vintage marked a return to classic weather after the extremes of 2003. Winter 2003–04 was cold and rainy, which helped restore groundwater after the prior year’s drought. Spring proceeded normally with regular flowering and fruit set, and the vines carried a healthy, balanced crop load. Summer 2004 was moderate: daytime temperatures stayed around average, while nighttime temperatures were quite cool, yielding a large diurnal range (ideal for aroma and acid retention). Crucially, early autumn was dry with virtually no rain, so grapes could hang until optimal ripeness and were harvested in excellent health. The favorable conditions and lack of weather stress produced fully ripe grapes with great analytic balance.

Wine Profile: 
2004 is widely regarded as an outstanding Amarone vintage. The wines are rich and structured, yet also fresh and balanced. In the glass, they display intense, deep color and extracted flavors. Tannins achieved full maturity – they are plentiful but refined, giving these wines a solid framework without harshness. The 2004s also boast significant alcohol levels, but importantly the alcohol is well-integrated, buffered by incisive acidity that keeps the wines vibrant. This balance of power (ripe fruit, alcohol, tannin) and poise (acidity, finesse) makes 2004 Amarones very complete. Classic notes of black cherry, cocoa, and sweet spice are common, often with aromatic elegance from the cool nights. It’s deservedly rated among the best vintages of Valpolicella in modern times.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Amarones from 2004 have excellent aging ability. Now approaching 20 years, many top bottlings are still vibrant and even improving – a testament to their balance. This year is frequently likened to other “golden” vintages such as 2006 or 2016 in its combination of concentration and acidity that ensures longevity. Indeed, 2004 stands alongside 1997 and 1998 (in the previous decade) or 2016 and 2019 (in later years) as a reference point for quality. Those fortunate enough to have 2004s in the cellar can continue to hold them – they have the stuffing for long-term aging (20+ years total). In summary, 2004 produced important wines suitable for extended aging, and it remains a benchmark vintage.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
Heatwave conditions defined 2003 across Europe, and Valpolicella was no exception. After a normal winter, spring 2003 began unseasonably warm, setting the stage for what became an exceptionally hot, dry summer. Temperatures stayed well above average with scant rainfall through July and August. The extreme heat caused accelerated ripening and shriveling of grapes; yields were reduced and acid levels dropped quickly. Growers resorted to an early harvest to preserve acidity and avoid over-desiccation of the fruit. Early autumn remained mostly dry, which was helpful for the appassimento (grape drying) process, but by then grapes were already very high in sugar and low in juice.

Wine Profile: 
The 2003 Amarones are big and bold, but often lopsided. Thanks to the heat, they have high alcohol (often 16%+) and very ripe, even overripe, fruit flavors (stewed plum, raisin, fig). However, the intense heat also resulted in “tired” acidity – many wines lack the fresh acid backbone that Amarone needs for balance. Tannins tend to be thick but sometimes a bit coarse, and the overall impression can be one of weighty wines missing some elegance. In short, 2003 produced controversial, powerhouse Amarones: undeniably rich and warm, but often criticized for low acidity and a jammy character that can verge on flabbiness.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Given their structure (high alcohol, lower acid), 2003s aged quicker than cooler-vintage wines. Top producers who managed tannin extraction well have made drinkable wines now in their prime, but many 2003s are past peak, their fruit drying out under the alcoholic weight. This year is not considered a top-tier vintage – it stands in contrast to more balanced warm vintages like 2007 or 2015. In fact, internal industry opinions were divided from the start, with many regarding 2003 as “not among the best vintages of Amarone” due to its compromised finesse. Collectors often compare 2003 to 2007 (another hot year) – both are powerful, but 2007 had better acidity and poise, whereas 2003 remains a lesson in the limits of heat in Amarone production.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
Extremely challenging conditions make 2002 one of the most difficult Amarone vintages in recent memory. Northern Italy’s weather was poor overall, and Valpolicella was hit especially hard. Early August hailstorms severely damaged vineyards in the region. Additionally, a cool, rain-plagued summer hindered uniform ripening – prolonged rain prevented the grapes from maturing evenly in many areas. Yields were drastically reduced; even historic producers had to forgo certain top vineyards. Harvest was late and small, and many growers faced under-ripe, diluted grapes due to the lack of sunshine.

Wine Profile: 
Given the weather, relatively few Amarone were produced in 2002, and those that were made tend to be lighter, less concentrated wines. The alcohol levels remained modest and acidity could be elevated (as grapes struggled to fully ripen). Many wines lack the depth and power typical of Amarone; instead they emphasize red cherry, herb, and earthy tones with a leaner body. Tannins are often on the green side, though careful sorting helped some producers achieve respectable balance. Overall the quality was very inconsistent, and 2002 Amarones are considered middling at best. (Notably, some experienced winemakers did manage to craft surprisingly elegant, if lighter, wines – defying the vintage’s dire reputation – but these are exceptions.)

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Nearly all 2002s are fully mature or fading. This vintage lacked the structure for long-term aging, so any bottles still in cellars should be consumed sooner rather than later. Many producers themselves were pessimistic: Masi’s head winemaker noted 2002’s situation “was not rosy,” with much lower Amarone production, though a favorable autumn for drying grapes did allow a few “decent quality” wines to be made. In summary, 2002 is remembered alongside 1992 and 1984 as a washout year – a vintage to avoid for Amarone, with only rare bright spots from diligent wineries.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2001 season was relatively uneventful weather-wise. Spring had average rainfall and temperatures, and summer brought warm (but not extreme) heat in July and August with normal rain patterns. A dry, warm early autumn (September–October) ensured excellent ripening; harvest took place under favorable conditions, yielding healthy grapes with good ripeness.

Wine Profile: 
The 2001 Amarones are good but somewhat uneven in quality. Many wines showed solid structure and balance, but there were also frequent elements of rusticity. Tannins in some 2001s came across as rough or green, indicating slight under-ripeness in certain cases. Overall the aromatic profile features the classic dried cherry and herbal notes, but without the extra depth of top years. It’s regarded as a “fairly good” but not great vintage, with fewer truly outstanding wines.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
Now over two decades old, most 2001s that were worth cellaring have likely hit their plateau. The best examples (from producers who achieved better phenolic ripeness) still drink nicely, but many lesser 2001s have dried out. In retrospect, 2001 is not counted among the top Amarone vintages and is often compared to other “average” years like 2005 in its medium-term structure and slightly coarse edges. Enjoy any remaining bottles soon, as further improvement is unlikely.

Climate & Growing Conditions: 
The 2000 growing season saw fairly normal conditions. Spring weather and rainfall were average, followed by a warm July and August with typical precipitation. Early September brought some heavy rain, but this was followed by hot, dry weather through mid-October, allowing grapes to ripen fully and in healthy condition. Harvest timing was ideal, with perfectly ripe, healthy grapes and good balance in fruit chemistry.

Wine Profile: 
Amarone wines from 2000 are richly concentrated and well-balanced, with mature polyphenols and lively acidity contributing to their structure. They exhibit depth of flavor (dark cherry, dried fruits, spice) and integrated alcohol – hallmarks of a high-quality year. Tannins reached full ripeness, supporting a robust structure without rough edges.

Aging Potential & Comparison: 
This is considered an excellent vintage (rated 4½ out of 5 stars) and has proven long-lived. Many 2000 Amarones are at or nearing peak maturity now, after 20+ years of aging. Notably, the 2000 vintage rivals 1995 and 2015 in its great capacity for aging, with top wines still showing freshness and power. Professionals often compare 2000’s balance and longevity to those benchmark years, making it a prized vintage for collectors.

Climatic Conditions: 
1999 was a generally good year with a few weather swings. Spring saw average rainfall and temperatures, and the summer turned warm in July and August but was punctuated by rain at ideal times to nourish vines. A consistently warm, dry September allowed the grapes to complete ripening without issues. The harvest period was near-perfect, yielding clean, healthy fruit with balanced ripeness. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The 1999 Amarones are hefty and darkly colored, with plenty of volume and extract. They feature intense aromas of black cherry, dried blackberry, and licorice, along with hints of tar and spice. The palate is full-bodied and structured, albeit without the sheer opulence of 1997 or 1998. In some cases the tannins are still firm, suggesting the wines are geared for the long haul. 

Aging Potential: 
Quite good. While approachable in their relative youth, most 1999s were built to age 15–25 years thanks to their important structure and balance. Many are still drinking well in the mid-2020s, and the best bottles can further develop. 

Comparisons: 
1999 is sometimes termed a “sleeper” vintage – coming after several blockbusters, it didn’t initially get as much attention, but it has proven to be among the best vintages of Amarone for cellaring. It can be compared to 1985 or 2004 in that respect. Enthusiasts now recognize 1999 as a worthy finale to the 20th-century, capping off a remarkable run of 1995–1998 vintages with wines that deftly balance power and elegance.

Climatic Conditions: 
Another superb year, 1998 benefited from balanced conditions. A moderately rainy spring replenished water, then a warm (but not overly extreme) summer followed. Well-timed rains, followed by sunny stretches, produced an extraordinary vintage in Valpolicella. Grapes ripened fully and evenly, and the long autumn allowed an extended drying period for the harvested bunches. 

Wine Characteristics: 1998 Amarones are luxurious yet refined. They deliver overwhelming aromatic impact – lush dried fruit notes (raisin, fig, date) wrapped in sweet spices, espresso, and a touch of tobacco. On the palate, they are powerful and velvety, with remarkable balance between concentrated fruit, harmonious acidity, and well-integrated tannins. These wines have a “broad and caressing” texture with pedal-to-the-floor flavor intensity, but superbly shaped and not overdone. 

Aging Potential: 
Excellent. With their depth and structure, 1998s have shown the ability to evolve for two decades or more. Many are still in a great drinking window now, offering both the primary richness and emerging tertiary nuances. 

Comparisons: 
1998 stands tall among the greats of the late 20th century – often discussed alongside 1997, though with a shade more classic balance. Some critics have likened 1998’s style to a fusion of 1990’s structure and 1997’s extravagance, making it a favorite for many Amarone enthusiasts.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1997 vintage was a modern classic – hot and very dry. An unusually arid spring led to low yields. The summer was scorching and sunny, with heatwaves in August that accelerated ripening and concentrated sugars. Luckily, conditions at harvest remained stable, and grapes arrived in impeccable, very ripe condition. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1997 Amarones are lavish and head-turning. They showcase exceptionally complex aromas of ripe plums, black cherry, sweet spices, chocolate and tobacco. On the palate they are full-bodied, round, and glycerol-rich, with sweet, plush tannins and a long, fruit-packed finish. Many were approachable early due to their opulent fruit and soft tannin structure, yet also have the substance to age. 

Aging Potential: 
Very high. Though delicious young, the best 1997s have developed additional layers over 20+ years. As of the mid-2020s, they remain impressive, though some ultra-ripe examples are starting to peak. This vintage is a five-star legend, one that “enabled an excellent quality of the grapes, very healthy and with a high sugar content”. 

Comparisons: 
1997 is frequently mentioned in the same breath as 1988, 1990, and 2016 for Amarone – a benchmark ripe vintage. Its style – generous and flamboyant – is sometimes contrasted with the more classically structured 1995 or 1988, yet it undeniably produced some of Valpolicella’s most celebrated wines.

Climatic Conditions: The 1960 growing season was challenging, with cooler temperatures and above-average rain leading to a modest ripening of grapes.

Wine Characteristics: Amarones from this year were lighter in body, with muted aromas and higher acidity due to the less ripe fruit.

Aging Potential: These wines were best consumed relatively early; any surviving bottles are past their prime, as 1960 is generally regarded as an acceptable but not noteworthy vintage (rated only “good” two-star quality).

Comparisons: Lacking the warmth of later standout vintages, 1960 is often overshadowed by the far superior 1961.

Climatic Conditions: A warm, dry growing season with plenty of summer heat made 1961 one of Amarone’s first great vintages. Grapes achieved full ripeness under ideal conditions, with a dry harvest period preserving quality.

Wine Characteristics: Rich and powerful, 1961 Amarones showed intense dried fruit and spice aromas with a solid structure and balanced freshness.

Aging Potential: Thanks to their concentration and tannic backbone, the best 1961 Amarones aged gracefully for decades. This year is widely considered excellent, showcasing Amarone’s potential and often compared to the legendary 1964 in terms of depth and longevity.

Climatic Conditions: The 1962 season was more uneven – a fairly cool spring followed by a warm summer, but without the sustained heat of the previous year. Some mid-season rains limited grape concentration.

Wine Characteristics: The wines were of very good quality overall, offering pleasant dried cherry and herbal notes, though less opulent than 1961. Acidity was adequate, lending a slimmer profile.

Aging Potential: Most 1962 Amarones were enjoyable in their first 10–15 years and have largely faded. While solid, 1962 sits in the shadow of the more iconic vintages surrounding it.

Climatic Conditions: Above-average rainfall and cooler weather marked 1963, making it a difficult vintage. The wet conditions hindered full ripening and reduced grape quality.

Wine Characteristics: Amarones from 1963 are lighter, with subdued aromas and noticeable earthy–herbaceous tones. They lacked the richness expected of the style, with thinner structure and lower alcohol.

Aging Potential: This was a poor vintage (only “acceptable” in vintage charts), and the wines were not built for long aging – most peaked quickly and are long past enjoyment.

Comparisons: 1963 is often mentioned alongside other weak years like 1972 and 1984 as one of the least successful Amarone vintages of the era.

Climatic Conditions: A very good growing season, 1964 saw abundant spring rain followed by a long dry summer. Only a few light showers arrived in September, and October weather was very nice and dry. This allowed the grapes to ripen fully and remain healthy through harvest.

Wine Characteristics: The 1964 Amarones revealed the “enormous potential” of the style. They combined power and finesse – as one account notes, oscillating between the solidity of a great Bordeaux and the elegance of Burgundy. Expect deep garnet color, rich dried plum, hazelnut, cocoa and tobacco notes, with spice and lively energy.

Aging Potential: Structured and dynamic, top 1964s have shown remarkable longevity – bottles properly stored can still be rewarding. This year firmly ranks among Amarone’s early classic vintages, setting a quality benchmark for the decade.

Climatic Conditions: 1965 experienced a wet, cool growing season, resulting in one of the weaker vintages of the 1960s. Rain during critical summer weeks impeded optimal ripening. 

Wine Characteristics: Lighter-bodied and straightforward, 1965 Amarones displayed simple red fruit flavors with a lean, short finish. They lacked the concentration and spice complexity of better years. 

Aging Potential: A vintage of only acceptable quality, most wines were intended for early to mid-term drinking and did not reward extended cellaring. Few examples exist today, and those that do have long since faded. 

Comparisons: 1965 is viewed similarly to 1963 in quality – a modest year sandwiched between 1964’s excellence and the upcoming 1966 rebound.

Climatic Conditions: Improved weather returned in 1966. A warm summer with relatively lower rainfall produced healthier, riper grapes than the previous year. 

Wine Characteristics: The wines are considered good, with a fuller body and riper fruit character than 1965. Notes of dried cherry, subtle baking spice, and a touch of licorice can be found, supported by moderate tannins. Acidity remained sound, giving a bit more freshness. 

Aging Potential: While not a top-tier vintage, 1966 Amarones aged moderately well; the best bottles drank well into the 1980s. Overall, it marked a positive step up in structure and depth, often seen as a prelude to the very strong 1967 vintage.

Climatic Conditions: A very good vintage for Amarone, 1967 had a wet spring followed by a hot, dry summer. The prolonged heat and sunshine yielded perfectly healthy, sugar-rich grapes by harvest. 

Wine Characteristics: 1967 Amarones are robust and flavorful – expect intense dried plum and fig notes, black truffle, walnut and chocolate nuances, underpinned by ample warmth and spice. They showed an impressive balance of ripeness and acidity, with tannins that smoothed out over time. Notably, these wines surprised tasters with their integrity and freshness even decades later. 

Aging Potential: Thanks to the excellent grape maturity, 1967s were built to age. Many have demonstrated longevity into the 2000s for well-stored bottles. This year stands as one of the high points of the 1960s, comparable in stature to 1964 and later echoed by the great 1988 vintage in terms of hot-season character.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1968 growing season was uneven – intermittent summer rain and cooler spells followed a mild spring. Ripening was adequate but not optimal, and growers had to be selective during harvest. 

Wine Characteristics:
Amarones from 1968 are middle-of-the-road. They offer pleasant dried red fruit and herbal aromatics, but without the concentration or depth of top years. The palate tends toward a medium body with slightly coarse tannins and a shorter finish. 

Aging Potential: 
A good but not great vintage, most 1968s were best enjoyed by the 1980s. They do not have the structure for extended aging, and any remaining bottles are mainly of historical interest. 

Comparisons: 
1968 is often overlooked, especially coming after 1967. It can be likened to later “average” vintages such as 1991 – drinkable and enjoyable in youth, but lacking the pedigree of truly collectible years.

Climatic Conditions: 
1969 proved tricky due to excessive rain late in the season. After a fair summer, September brought unwelcome precipitation, forcing an earlier harvest in some areas and yielding less concentrated fruit. 

Wine Characteristics: 
Lighter and more acidic, 1969 Amarones have notable earthy and green herbal undertones. Fruit expression is modest (sour cherry, cranberry) and the wines showed a leaner style with elevated tartness and softer structure. However, some well-made examples retained surprising freshness over time. 

Aging Potential: 
Initially meant for earlier drinking, a few 1969s from top producers that saw long cask aging remained intact for a couple of decades. In general though, this vintage did not produce long-lived wines. 

Comparisons: 
1969’s profile is comparable to later underperforming rainy vintages (like 1989 or 1992) – sound but lacking the richness expected of Amarone’s reputation.

Climatic Conditions: 
A return to favorable weather made 1970 a standout year. Warm, consistent summer temperatures with limited rain allowed grapes to ripen evenly. Harvest conditions were largely dry and trouble-free. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1970 Amarones are excellent, offering a classic profile of concentrated dark cherry and dried currant fruit, with ample spice and chocolate nuances. The wines had a big structure yet also a certain elegance. Tasters have noted their striking freshness and integrity even after many years, indicating good natural acidity alongside the richness. 

Aging Potential: 
This is among the first post-1960 vintages considered truly ageworthy – well-cellared bottles continued to show well into the 2000s. 1970 is often mentioned in the same breath as 1971 and 1974, and it set a high bar that wouldn’t be clearly surpassed until the mid-1980s.

Climatic Conditions: 
1971 enjoyed a warm growing season quite similar to 1970. A hot summer with sufficient rainfall at key times led to full phenolic ripeness in the vineyards. 

Wine Characteristics: The 1971 wines are rich and velvety, with layers of dried black cherry, prune, and sweet tobacco. Tannins were ample yet softer than 1970’s, and the overall impression is one of harmony. If 1970 showed power, 1971 leaned slightly more into finesse. 

Aging Potential: 
Rated very good (roughly four-star caliber), 1971 Amarones aged gracefully. Many remained vibrant through the 1990s, displaying a Burgundian finesse with age. 

Comparisons: 
1971 is frequently compared to 1964 for its balance, and presaged later superb vintages like 1988 in its combination of ripeness and elegance. It solidified the early 1970s as a golden period for Amarone.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1972 vintage was plagued by poor weather. A rainy, cool summer and harvest season disrupted the appassimento process and diluted grape quality. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1972 Amarones are among the weakest on record – thin in body with earthy, stemmy notes overshadowing fruit. Acids and tannins feel unripe, and any dried-fruit character is faint. 

Aging Potential: 
This poor one-star vintage did not produce wines for longevity; most were consumed early and those that lingered grew tired quickly. 

Comparisons: 
Along with 1984 and 2002, 1972 is often cited as a vintage to avoid. It underscored how crucial favorable autumn weather is for Amarone’s success, a lesson that producers took to heart in later decades.

Climatic Conditions: 
Conditions improved slightly in 1973. While spring was damp, the late summer turned warmer. Still, the season fell short of ideal with some intermittent rain. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The wines of 1973 are of average quality. They showed light dried cherry and spice aromas and moderate alcohol. Structure was on the softer side, with less extract – pleasant but lacking concentration. 

Aging Potential: Better than 1972 but not by much, 1973’s offerings were intended for mid-term drinking. A few higher-end bottlings provided enjoyment into the late 1980s, but overall the vintage was not built for very long cellaring. 

Comparisons: 
1973 sits in the middle ground, akin to later middling years like 1993 (though 1993 was somewhat better). It bridged the gap between the dismal 1972 and the much improved 1974.

Climatic Conditions: 
Despite reports of heavy rain across much of Europe in 1974, Valpolicella managed a quite successful harvest. Early summer saw some rain, but a dry, extended autumn helped rescue grape quality. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1974 is regarded as an excellent Amarone year, especially in the Classico zone. The wines are concentrated and deep, featuring rich plum, raisin, and dark chocolate notes, with ample spice and a firm tannic core. They were powerful in their youth, some with a rustic edge, but also packed with fruit sweetness. 

Aging Potential: 
High extract and acidity gave the top 1974s remarkable longevity – many remained vibrant and complex 30-40 years on. 

Comparisons: This vintage is sometimes likened to 1995 in character – a somewhat underrated year that produced outstanding, ageworthy Amarones given the right conditions and producer care.

Climatic Conditions: 
1975 saw a return to more ordinary weather. There were no extreme events, but a slightly cooler growing season and higher yields led to wines of only good quality. 

Wine Characteristics: 
Amarones from 1975 are softer and lighter than the big 1974s. They display red fruit and dried herb aromas, with moderate concentration. Tannins were mild, and the wines drank smoothly but without great complexity or length. Interestingly, several have maintained surprising freshness over time due to their balanced structure. 

Aging Potential: 
Most 1975 bottles were best enjoyed by the 1990s. While not a long-haul vintage, it wasn’t as short-lived as weaker years – a well-stored 1975 could still offer a pleasant if simple experience at 20+ years old. 

Comparisons: 
1975 can be compared to later “decent but unremarkable” vintages like 2005 – reliable, drinkable wines that just lack the extra dimension of great years.

Climatic Conditions: 
A hot, dry summer defined 1976, making it one of the very good vintages of the 1970s. The warmth stressed vines just enough to concentrate flavors, and minimal rain during harvest ensured optimal grape health. 

Wine Characteristics: The 1976 Amarones are generous and heady. Expect voluptuous dried black fruit (fig, blackberry jam) intertwined with notes of molasses, leather, and sweet spice. These wines were high in alcohol and extract, with a more robust, Port-like richness than usual. Acidity was lower, so the style is lush and forward. 

Aging Potential: 
Many 1976s drank beautifully through the 1990s and early 2000s; their slightly lower acid meant they peaked a bit earlier than a cooler vintage might. Nonetheless, as a ripe year, it holds a place alongside 1979 as one of the late-’70s highlights. 

Comparisons: 
1976’s hot conditions and opulence invite comparison to later warm vintages like 2003 or 2017, though the winemaking of the era kept the wines in a traditional framework despite the ripeness.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1977 growing season was inconsistent. After a reasonably warm start, rain towards harvest caused some dilution and challenges in the drying (appassimento) phase. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1977 Amarones are middling in quality. They tend to show more dried red fruits (cherry, redcurrant) and floral hints, but relatively light body and less complexity. Tannins were a bit green in some cases, reflecting the less-ripe phenolics. 

Aging Potential: 
This year’s wines were not meant for the long run; most were consumed by the late 1980s. A few better examples held on into the 1990s, but generally 1977 did not yield particularly ageworthy Amarone. 

Comparisons: 
1977 is analogous to vintages like 1994 – falling in the shadow of much stronger surrounding years (1976 and 1978 in this case) and remembered mostly for being average.

Climatic Conditions: 
1978 delivered a generally good growing season in Valpolicella. Summer temperatures were warm, though not excessively so, and late-season conditions were stable with only light rains. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The wines of 1978 are good to very good, offering a classic Amarone profile without extreme intensity. They feature balanced dried cherry and plum fruit, with notes of cocoa, spice, and a touch of balsam. Tannins were firm but ripe, supporting the fruit nicely. 

Aging Potential: 
Many 1978 Amarones developed well over 20+ years, thanks to their sound structure and harmony. By the 2000s they began to decline, but the best bottles provided a long window of enjoyment. 

Comparisons:
1978 sits alongside 1976 and 1979 as part of a trio of strong late-’70s vintages. It is often fondly compared to 1985 – not as heralded as 1983 or 1988, but delivering excellent quality and balance.

Climatic Conditions: 
1979 was another excellent year, with a hot summer and dry harvest period. Vines bore a smaller crop of very ripe grapes, concentrating flavors. Any scattered early September rains were followed by clear, sunny weather that aided the final ripening and drying stages. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The 1979 Amarones are full-bodied and rich, marked by intense dried black cherry, raisin, and spicy fruitcake aromas. Many wines have a deep color and viscous texture. They boasted high alcohol and extract, yet retained sufficient acidity to keep them vibrant. 

Aging Potential: 
A top vintage, 1979 produced wines with formidable structure – well-stored examples remained impressive 30+ years later. This year is sometimes called a precursor to the greatness of 1983 and 1988. 

Comparisons: 
In style, 1979 can be likened to 1990 (another warm, abundant year yielding powerful, long-lived Amarones), solidifying its reputation as one of the best pre-1980 vintages.

Climatic Conditions: 
1980 saw cooler-than-average weather and significant rainfall, especially late in the season. It was a challenging year that required rigorous grape selection. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The resulting wines are average in quality. 1980 Amarones are lighter, with a red-fruited profile (dried cranberry, sour cherry) and pronounced earthy, herbal notes. They lack some depth and concentration; acidity tends to be elevated relative to body, giving a somewhat austere impression. 

Aging Potential: 
Most 1980s were for early to mid-term drinking. A decade or two on, they quickly lost fruit and became dominated by earthy tertiary notes. 

Comparisons: 
1980 is often grouped with 1984 and 1987 as a weaker vintage. It taught producers valuable lessons that would inform vineyard and drying strategies in later difficult years.

Climatic Conditions: 
Weather improved in 1981, although it wasn’t an outstanding year. A moderate summer with no extreme heat and a reasonably dry autumn yielded a healthy but not particularly small crop. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1981 Amarones are good and balanced. They show classic dried red and black cherry flavors, hints of leather and spice, and a medium-full body. While not as lush as the ’79s or ’83s, they have a correctness and charm, with tannins in proportion and decent acidity. 

Aging Potential: 
Many wines from 1981 aged well into the 1990s, with the best surviving around two decades. They did not have the sheer stuffing to last much longer, so few are noteworthy today. 

Comparisons: 
1981 might be likened to an “in-between” vintage such as 1996 – satisfying and well-made, if not particularly memorable against the backdrop of more stellar years.

Climatic Conditions: 
Given the excellence of 1982 in other Italian regions, Valpolicella’s 1982 was surprisingly below par. A hot early summer was followed by heavy rain in late summer and around harvest, causing dilution and some rot issues. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The wines turned out lighter than expected – soft and approachable, with simple dried cherry and raspberry notes and relatively low tannin. Without the concentration, some 1982 Amarones came off almost like a robust Valpolicella. They earned only a one-star “acceptable” rating in vintage charts. 

Aging Potential: 
1982s were best consumed on the younger side. Lacking structure, few improved after 8–10 years. This year proved that even a generally warm vintage can disappoint if untimely rains hit during the drying period. 

Comparisons: 
1982 stands as an anomaly given its reputation elsewhere; in Valpolicella it’s remembered much like 1972 – a letdown sandwiched between far better years (1981 and the superb 1983).

Climatic Conditions: 
An outstanding vintage, 1983 had a hot, dry summer that stretched well into harvest. Early spring rains replenished water tables, but from June onward temperatures were high. Despite some humidity in late summer, a window of fine weather in September allowed growers to pick perfectly ripe, healthy grapes. 

Wine Characteristics:
Amarones from 1983 are monumental – five-star quality across the board. They burst with ultra-ripe prune, dried blackberry, and fig notes, layered with dark chocolate, espresso, and sweet spice. Many had elevated alcohol and extract, yet also the acidity and structure for long life. A Bertani tasting note from this year highlights strong tannins and intensity suggesting “a further growth” with time. 

Aging Potential: 
These wines have proven their pedigree; 1983 Amarones continued to evolve and enchant well into their 30th+ year. Even now, rare bottles can still be vibrant. 

Comparisons: 
1983 is often considered on par with later legends like 1988, 1990, and 1997. It firmly established the 1980s as Amarone’s coming-of-age decade on the world stage.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1984 season was marred by poor weather. A cool, rainy summer persisted into the harvest period, making it one of the weakest vintages of the era. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1984 Amarones are dilute and simple. Thin flavors of tart red fruit, green herbs, and a lack of concentration characterize these wines. Tannins were light and sometimes a bit astringent. They earned only a two-star (below average) vintage assessment. 

Aging Potential: 
Short-term at best – most 1984s were consumed in their youth, as they had neither the fruit nor structure to benefit from aging. Any that survived into the late 1990s were tired and largely devoid of charm. 

Comparisons: 
Along with 1972, 1984 is regarded as a very poor Amarone vintage. It highlighted the challenges of cool, wet years, much like 2014 would decades later, and remains a cautionary tale for the importance of vintage conditions.

Climatic Conditions: 
A cold winter (notably the big freeze of January 1985) and a late spring gave way to a warm, dry summer and a long, favorable autumn. The result was a excellent vintage in Valpolicella. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1985 Amarones are generous yet structured. They feature dense dried cherry and plum flavors, with noteworthy freshness – the cool start to the year helped retain acidity. Layers of peppery spice, leather, and walnut emerge with age. The wines have an elegant balance, combining the ripe fruit of a warm year with the vibrancy from slow maturation on the vine. 

Aging Potential: 
High. Many 1985s have aged beautifully for 25–30 years, the best still drinking well around their 40th year. This vintage’s equilibrium of fruit and acid made it one of the most cellar-worthy of the ’80s. 

Comparisons: 
Often compared to 1995, 1985 produced classic Amarones of both power and refinement. It stands just a notch below the iconic 1983/1988 duo, but clearly above most others in the decade.

Climatic Conditions: 
1986 was a decent if unspectacular year. Weather patterns were relatively normal, with a moderately warm summer and some rain in early autumn that winemakers had to contend with. 

Wine Characteristics:
The wines are good (roughly three-star quality), offering a textbook Amarone profile without exceptional intensity. Dried red fruits, hints of cola and spice, and a medium body are typical. Tannins were adequate, though not as polished as in top years. 

Aging Potential: 
The 1986s drank well through the 1990s and early 2000s. They had enough balance to age 15–20 years, but generally began to decline after that, as they were not as concentrated. 

Comparisons: 
1986 can be likened to vintages such as 1978 or 2006 – solid and reliable, producing enjoyable wines that simply lack the extra dimension of greatness.

Climatic Conditions: 
A troublesome growing season, 1987 was cool and unusually wet. Frequent rains, especially near harvest, made grape drying difficult and diluted many wines. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1987 Amarones are among the more forgettable vintages. Light in color and body, they present straightforward sour cherry and leafy flavors with elevated acidity. Tannins are mild, and overall the wines feel out of balance – both thin and slightly tart. They earned only two stars in vintage rankings. 

Aging Potential: 
Limited – most 1987s were consumed early, as there was little benefit to holding them. By the late 1990s, any remaining bottles were well past their best, given the lack of fruit concentration to sustain aging. 

Comparisons: 
1987 joins 1980 and 1984 as part of a trio of below-par ’80s vintages. It underscores how a rainy harvest can undermine Amarone quality, much as happened again in 1992.

Climatic Conditions: 
1988 is heralded as one of Amarone’s finest vintages of the century. The weather was near-perfect: a warm growing season with dry conditions through harvest yielded impeccably ripe grapes. There were no significant climate extremes – just consistent, favorable ripening. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The 1988 wines are superbly balanced and complex. They offer deep flavors of black cherry liqueur, dried plum, cocoa, and baking spices, all wrapped in a full-bodied, velvety frame. Critic tastings have noted “prune, bitter chocolate, smoked meat and black pepper” tones in top examples, with a dense, fine structure and very long finish. Acidity and tannin are in harmony, giving a sense of freshness despite the richness. 

Aging Potential: 
Exceptional – 1988 Amarones have proven their longevity, often drinking at peak 20–30 years from vintage. Even now, well-stored bottles can be profound. 

Comparisons: 
Frequently compared to 1990 and 1997, 1988 is a benchmark for a “complete” Amarone vintage, delivering both power and elegance. It solidified Valpolicella’s reputation internationally, much like 1983 did, and is still referenced as a standard for quality.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1989 vintage was a letdown following the highs of 1988. Weather turned wet and cool; a damp summer and rainy pre-harvest period led to diluted fruit and some mold issues on the drying racks. 

Wine Characteristics: 
Consequently, 1989 Amarones are lighter and more acidic. Red fruit notes are present but muted, and earthy, vegetal hints are more pronounced due to less-than-ideal ripeness. Structure is lacking – the wines feel thin, with soft tannins and higher acidity sticking out. Not surprisingly, vintage charts rated 1989 only two stars (below average). 

Aging Potential: 
Short. Most 1989s were best in the first 5–10 years. Without concentration, they didn’t improve with further cellaring, and by the early 2000s, few were worth keeping. 
Comparisons: 1989 is often grouped with 1980, 1984, 1987 as an inferior year. Like 1992 which followed a great 1990, 1989 shows how a dramatic swing in weather (after 1988) can drastically affect Amarone quality.

Climatic Conditions: 
An ideal growing season made 1990 a banner year. Spring rains (concentrated in March–May) replenished soils, then a fairly dry, hot summer set in. September remained warm and dry, allowing full phenolic ripeness. The withering period (appassimento) benefited from healthy, sugar-rich grapes and proceeded under optimal conditions. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1990 Amarones are opulent and structured – a five-star vintage. They exhibit intense flavors of dried black cherry, fig, and chocolate, with notes of walnut, sweet tobacco, and vanilla from oak maturation. The wines are round and deeply concentrated, with a firm acidic spine and high alcohol beautifully integrated. 

Aging Potential: 
Outstanding. The best 1990s have decades of life; even after 30+ years many show youthful fruit and evolving tertiary complexity. This vintage’s combination of richness and balance has ensured longevity comparable to the legendary 1988. 

Comparisons: 
1990 is frequently mentioned alongside 1988, 1997, and 2016 as one of Amarone’s all-time greats. Its wines, described as “healthy and ripe with high sugar content”, set a standard that modern producers still celebrate.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1991 season was unremarkable but generally favorable. Average rainfall and temperatures in spring were followed by a warm (though not excessively hot) summer. September and October saw little rain and plenty of warm, dry days, which allowed good ripening and a “perfect harvest with healthy grapes”. 

Wine Characteristics:
Amarones from 1991 are fairly good in quality. They tend to have solid but not huge structure, with flavors of dried cherry, red plum, and herbs. In some cases, there was a bit of roughness or green tannin detectable, reflecting a vintage of divergent results. The best wines are balanced and enjoyable, while lesser examples came off slightly hollow. 

Aging Potential: 
1991s have a mid-tier aging curve – many were at their best around 10–15 years of age. A few top bottlings with greater concentration lasted into their third decade, but overall this vintage is not known for extreme longevity. 

Comparisons: 
In retrospect, 1991 is considered a “good but not great” year, similar to 2001 or 2011: plenty of enjoyable wines, though lacking the extra depth that defines the greatest vintages.

Climatic Conditions: 
1992 was a difficult, rain-plagued vintage. After an acceptable spring, heavy rains in late summer and early autumn severely affected grape quality. Producers struggled with rot and diluted fruit, making it one of the weakest years of the ’90s. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1992 Amarones are light and lack complexity. Thin notes of sour cherry and green pepper can appear, and the wines have higher acidity with low extract. Tannins are sparse, and overall balance is lacking. The vintage received a mere two to two-and-a-half star rating, reflecting its mediocrity. 

Aging Potential: 
Very limited. Most 1992s were consumed quickly, as there was little to be gained from cellaring. By the early 2000s, virtually all had fallen off, with fruit gone and only acidic structure remaining. 

Comparisons: 
1992 is often equated with notorious off-years like 1984 – a vintage best forgotten. It did, however, push many estates to invest in better vineyard drainage and sorting techniques, improvements that paid off when similar weather struck in later years.

Climatic Conditions: 
A rebound in 1993 brought a very good vintage. The growing season was warmer and drier than 1992, with only minimal disruptions. Ripening was thorough and grapes were harvested in healthy condition. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1993 Amarones are refined and well-balanced. They show plenty of dried cherry and blackberry fruit, with spicy oak, cocoa, and floral highlights. Tannins came out ripe and polished. While not as massive as 1990 or 1995, the 1993s have an appealing harmony and mid-weight structure. Many are described as elegant and finely tuned. 

Aging Potential: 
Better than initially expected – the top 1993 wines aged 20+ years with ease. The vintage’s natural balance allowed some examples to improve and gain complexity over time. It sits in the second tier of the decade, making it an “other excellent” year worth cellaring. 

Comparisons: 
1993 is sometimes compared to 1985 or 2004: overshadowed by bigger years around it, yet yielding beautifully crafted, long-lived wines that impress those who give them a chance.

Climatic Conditions: 
1994 saw mixed weather. A hot early summer was interrupted by rain events later in the season, but a sufficiently dry window before harvest preserved a good portion of the crop. Overall conditions were decent, though not ideal. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The wines of 1994 turned out surprisingly good – better than many anticipated. They carry rich flavors of dried red fruits, cloves, and cedar, with a round, approachable demeanor. Not as intensely structured as the top vintages, 1994 Amarones tend to have softer tannins and slightly lower acidity, making them generous in their youth. Vintage assessments give it around four-and-a-half stars, just shy of the top rank. 

Aging Potential: 
Many 1994s drank well in the 2000s and were at their peak around 15–20 years of age. A few of the best may have stretched to 25 years, but generally this vintage was best enjoyed on the earlier side of “long-term.” 

Comparisons: 
Some compare 1994 to 2007 – a vintage that produced plenty of excellent wines even if lacking the drama of the most celebrated years. It is considered a “winemaker’s vintage,” where careful selection could result in Amarones of very high quality despite the season’s challenges.

Climatic Conditions: 
The 1995 growing season was very favorable. After a mild winter and early spring, a dry, hot summer set in. There was a bit of rain in July and again briefly in early September, but significantly less than in the prior four vintages. Crucially, late September and October were warm and clear, allowing full ripeness and an excellent withering phase. 

Wine Characteristics: 
1995 Amarones are superb – rich, layered, and structured. They feature majestic flavors (as noted by producers like Zenato) of dried cherries, bay leaf, and chocolate, with an intense, ethereal profile. The wines show a striking balance between concentration and tension (vibrant acidity) that makes them both powerful and age-worthy.

 Aging Potential: 
Extremely high. The 1995s, always expected to age well, have indeed proven long-lived. At 20–25 years they were often still evolving, and even now at around 30 years many top examples continue to drink beautifully, combining mature complexity with freshness. 

Comparisons: 
1995 stands alongside 1990, 1997, and 1998 as a pinnacle of the ’90s. It is often praised for its classic structure – in some ways a throwback to 1988 in style – and remains a reference point for its decade.

Climatic Conditions: 
1996 was uneven and is regarded as a mediocre vintage. A relatively cool spring led to a delayed start, and although summer had warm periods, rain near harvest hindered optimal ripeness. Yields were on the higher side as well, which further diluted quality. 

Wine Characteristics: 
The wines of 1996 are simple and lack stuffing. Light to medium-bodied, they present tart red fruit flavors and herbaceous notes. Tannins can be a bit harsh or green, indicating some underripeness, and overall the wines feel out of balance. Vintage ratings gave 1996 about two-and-a-half stars. 

Aging Potential: 
Low. These wines were best consumed young; by 8–12 years of age most had already lost what fruit they had. Few if any bottles from 1996 would be particularly enjoyable today. 

Comparisons: 
1996 is often mentioned alongside similarly dull vintages like 1989 or 2014. While drinkable in a basic sense, it was a disappointment sandwiched between the excellent 1995 and the stellar 1997 that followed.